Sep 1, 2. Min read time. In 1. JFK ordered a complete withdrawal from Vietnam. President and Mrs. Kennedy arrive at Love Field, Dallas, Texas on November 2. Photograph by Cecil Stoughton, White House, in the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston. Forty years have passed since November 2. What, at the moment of his death, was John F. Kennedys policy toward Vietnam Its one of the big questions, alternately evaded and disputed over four decades of historical writing. It bears on Kennedys reputation, of course, though not in an unambiguous way. And today, larger issues are at stake as the United States faces another indefinite military commitment that might have been avoided and that, perhaps, also cannot be won. The story of Vietnam in 1. More deeply, appreciating those distant events tests our capacity as a country to look the reality of our own history in the eye. One may usefully introduce the issue by recalling the furor over Robert Mc. Namaras 1. 99. 5 memoir In Retrospect. Reaction then focused mainly on Mc. Namaras assumption of personal responsibility for the war, notably his declaration that his own actions as the Secretary of Defense responsible for it were terribly, terribly wrong. Reviewers paid little attention to the books contribution to history. In an editorial on April 1. New York Times delivered a harsh judgment Perhaps the only value of In Retrospect is to remind us never to forget that these were men who in the full hubristic glow of their power would not listen to logical warning or ethical appeal. And in the New York Times Book Review four days later, Max Frankel wrote that. David Halberstam, who applied that ironic phrase The Best and the Brightest to his rendering of the tale 2. Mr. Mc. Namara does now. So too, did the Pentagon Papers, that huge trove of documents assembled at Mr. Mc. Namaras behest when he first recognized a debt to history. In view of these criticisms, readers who actually pick up Mc. Namaras book may experience a shock when they scan the table of contents and sees this summary of Chapter 3, titled The Fateful Fall of 1. August 2. 4November 2. A pivotal period of U. S. involvement in Vietnam, punctuated by three important events the overthrow and assassination of South Vietnams president Ngo Dinh Diem President Kennedys decision on October 2 to begin the withdrawal of U. S. forces and his assassination fifty days later. Emphasis added. Kennedys decision on October 2, 1. U. S. forces from South Vietnam Contrary to Frankel, this is not something you will find in Halberstam. You will not find it in Leslie Gelbs editorial summary in the Gravel edition of The Pentagon Papers, even though several documents that are important to establishing the case for a Kennedy decision to withdraw were published in that edition. Nor, with just three exceptions prior to last springs publication of Howard Joness Death of a Generationa milestone in the search for difficult, ferociously hidden truthwill you find it elsewhere in 3. Vietnam. Did John F. Kennedy give the order to withdraw from Vietnam ertainly, most Vietnam historians have said noor would have if they considered the question worth posing. They have asserted continuity between Kennedys policy and Lyndon Johnsons, while usually claiming that neither president liked the war and also that Kennedy especially had expressed to friends his desire to get out sometime after the 1. The view that Kennedy would have done what Johnson didstay in Vietnam and gradually escalate the war in 1. Noam Chomsky to Kai Bird to William Gibbons. It was promoted forcefully over the years by the late Walt Rostow, beginning in 1. Johnson himself of Kennedys public statements on Vietnam policy and continuing into the 1. Gibbonss three volume study states it this way On November 2. Johnson approved NSAM National Security Action Memorandum 2. U. S. commitment to Vietnam and the continuation of Vietnam programs and policies of the Kennedy administration. Equally, Stanley Karnow writes in his Vietnam A History 1. Johnsons pledge essentially signaled a continuation of Kennedys policy. Patrick Lloyd Hatcher, while writing extensively on the Saigon coup, makes no mention at all of the Washington discussions following Johnsons accession three weeks later. Gary Hess offers summary judgment on the policy that Johnson inherited To Kennedy and his fellow New Frontiersmen, it was a doctrine of faith that the problems of Vietnam lent themselves to an American solution. Kai Birds 1. Mc. George and William Bundy briefly reviews the discussions of withdrawal reported to have occurred in late 1. Kennedy did not intend to quit. Microsoft Money Plus Sunset Crackers. So does Fredrik Logevall, whose substantial 1. Kennedy faced were either escalation or negotiation and did not include withdrawal without negotiation. All this and more is in spite of evidence to the contrary, advanced over the years by a tiny handful of authors. In 1. 97. 2 Peter Dale Scott first made the case that Johnsons NSAM 2. Gibbons relied on in making the case for continuitywas in fact a departure from Kennedys policy his essay appeared in Gravels edition of The Pentagon Papers. Arthur M. Schlesingers Robert Kennedy and His Times tells in a few tantalizing pages of the first application in October 1. Kennedys phased withdrawal plan. A more thorough treatment appeared in 1. John M. Newmans JFK and Vietnam. Until his retirement in 1. Newman was a major in the U. S. Army, an intelligence officer last stationed at Fort Meade, headquarters of the National Security Agency. As an historian, his specialty is deciphering declassified recordsa talent he later applied to the CIAs long hidden archives on Lee Harvey Oswald. Newmans argument was not a case of counterfactual historical reasoning, as Larry Berman described it in an early response. It was not about what might have happened had Kennedy lived. Newmans argument was stronger Kennedy, he claims, had decided to begin a phased withdrawal from Vietnam, that he had ordered this withdrawal to begin. Here is the chronology, according to Newman 1 On October 2, 1. Kennedy received the report of a mission to Saigon by Mc. Namara and Maxwell Taylor, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff JCS. The main recommendations, which appear in Section IB of the Mc. Namara Taylor report, were that a phased withdrawal be completed by the end of 1. Defense Department should announce in the very near future presently prepared plans to withdraw 1,0. U. S. military personnel stationed in Vietnam by the end of 1. At Kennedys instruction, Press Secretary Pierre Salinger made a public announcement that evening of Mc. Namaras recommended timetable for withdrawal. On October 5, Kennedy made his formal decision. Newman quotes the minutes of the meeting that day The President also said that our decision to remove 1,0. U. S. advisors by December of this year should not be raised formally with Diem. Instead the action should be carried out routinely as part of our general posture of withdrawing people when they are no longer needed. Emphasis added. The passage illustrates two points a that a decision was in fact made on that day, and b that despite the earlier announcement of Mc. Namaras recommendation, the October 5 decision was not a ruse or pressure tactic to win reforms from Diem as Richard Reeves, among others, has contended. Diem or his reactions. On October 1. White House issued NSAM 2. The President approved the military recommendations contained in section I B 1 3 of the report, but directed that no formal announcement be made of the implementation of plans to withdraw 1,0. U. S. military personnel by the end of 1. In other words, the withdrawal recommended by Mc. Namara on October 2 was embraced in secret by Kennedy on October 5 and implemented by his order on October 1. Palm Springs Weekend 1. IMDb. Edit. Storyline. Set in Palm Springs during a long, fun filled weekend where several Los Angeles college students flock to spring break, centering on Jim who finds romance with Bunny, the daughter of Palm Springs harried, stressed, police chief. Jims bumbling roommate, Biff, tries to get Amanda, a tomboyish girls attention with a so called love gadget. Meanwhile, Gayle Lewis is a high school senior posing as a wealthy college girl who is pursued by Eric Dean, a wealthy and spoiled college preppie, while Gayle has eyes for a cowboy from Texas, named Stretch. Also Jim and Biffs basketball coach, Campbell, tries to romance Naomi, the owner of the motel where all of the gang is staying, which is interfered with by Naomis young, trouble making brat son, whos dubbed Boom Boom. Written by. Matthew Patay. Plot SummaryAdd Synopsis. Taglines. Its where the boys are and the girls are. See more . Edit. Did You Know Trivia. Jerry Van Dyke does a similar banjo routine in the Dick Van Dyke Show later in his career. See more. In the car chase, Ty Hardin is driving a two tone red and white 1. Mercury convertible. After the crash it is an all red 1. Mercury convertible. See more. Eric dials his home phone number from a payphone rest stop. Henry Blanchard. into the phone. Oh, hello Mr. Blanchard. Is my father in Henry Blanchard. Hes not here. Your father and the new Mrs. Dean, number six, left from Reno two days ago on their sunny honeymoon to Acapulco, Mexico. He went and did it again, huh He didnt say if he was planning to stop in Palm Springs for a couple of days Henry Blanchard. No, he didnt mention it. He does know that Im staying here and where to locate me Henry Blanchard. Yes, yes, I told. See more. Connections. Referenced in The Wanderers 1. See more. Soundtracks. Written by Larry Kusik and Paul Evans. Sung by Troy Donahue.